Thursday, 15 May 2008
Home arrow Local News arrow Red light cameras remain high priority
InVenice Poll
Do you feel like Local,State and Federal Agencys Care about You and your Family?
Main Menu
Home
My Tube
Local News
Clubs and Organizations
Election 2008
Grass Roots
911 investigations
The Police State
Florida News
Fun Facts :Things to Know
National News
World News
Music News
Forum
Weather
Soap Box
News Feeds
Swanny's Fun Room
Florida Facts: Things to Know
Web Links


Red light cameras remain high priority E-mail
Written by By Jack Gurney   
Thursday, 08 February 2007

 

Automated traffic cameras have been used to discourage red-light runners in 23 states and hundreds of cities, but are prohibited by Florida lawmakers who don't like them. Sarasota County is exploring a legal loophole that may finally allow their installation.

Last week, the county commission agreed to explore a proposal that would clear the way for what are known as "Red Flex" cameras at dangerous intersections, in return for a revenue-splitting arrangement with the vendor from the collection of ticket fines.

The concept was suggested by Commissioner Paul Mercier. It is similar to one pursued by former four-term Commissioner David Mills that was twice attempted on a trial basis as a pilot project, but rejected by state lawmakers and transportation officials.

Mercier reported that four Florida cities -- Apopka, Gulf Breeze, Palm Coast and Pembrooke Pines -- had managed to circumvent the state prohibition by adopting local traffic ordinances. As a charter county, Sarasota County could do the same.

Red Flex Traffic Systems is an Arizona-based firm that focuses almost exclusively on the installation of remote cameras. It became an industry leader by working with communities to overcome cost issues and opposition from remote surveillance detractors.

"There are six companies that compete for contracts," said Cherif Elsadek, a Red Flex director. "We've been working at this for 22 years and control about 50 percent of the market because photo enforcement is the only thing we do."

 

Rebound

According to Elsadek, communities that install cameras to capture red-light runners on film and ticket vehicle owners typically experience a 60- to 70-percent reduction in violations within about six months, which cuts into ticket revenue.

"This is something we have to factor into contracts," he said. "If a community collects $125 for a red violation, we usually get between $24 and $44. What we've learned is that when the cameras are removed, conditions stabilize and drivers start to run red lights again."

Last year, the county allowed Peek Traffic to install remote cameras at two intersections as a pilot project. Nearly 3,000 red-light runners were captured on film, and warning letters were sent to about 800 vehicle owners identified by license plate numbers.

Fines were not imposed because state law currently prohibits them. But Elsadek said charter communities that adopt "red light zone" or "dangerous intersection" traffic ordinances can enforce them by installing remote cameras on private property and issuing citations.

"A CVS Pharmacy or Target Store can lease us 4 square feet outside the road right of way for the installation of a pole so we can mount our cameras," he said. "It may not be necessary in the future because three bills will be introduced in the Florida Legislature this year."

It will be an upset if one succeeds.

The "Mark Wandell Traffic Safety Act" was introduced for three straight years (from 2004-06), but never made it to the floor for a vote. It would memorialize a Sarasota resident killed by a driver who ran a red light.

 http://www.venicegondolier.com/Newsstory.cfm?pubdate=020707&story=tp3vn4.htm&folder=NewsArchive3

{mos_sb_discuss:13}

Life in Paradise or not        

 
 
< Prev   Next >
Design by Joomlactive
© 2008 invenice.net
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.