|
The workings of the Human Mind and the workings of getting to the bottom of what really happened on Sept. 11 2007 are having a tug of war over a fiery pit .
I don't go to many 9-11 sites at all.As a matter of fact , I go out of my way to avoid over played sites.
I avoid most political sites. As you can see in this site I am following the News Print and if you have been to any of my video file sites which you go to when you click on my video links you will see I am following News,Video and even Audio. I don't have time for the nonsense that is RAMPENT in just about any forum that I have entered.
I do not consider the rabid mindset to be an honest measure of what people see and know about the 9/11 Truth Movement. I am a little concerned that the people in the 9/11 Truth Movement are like Babes in the Woods when it comes to the immense evil being well worked in a very organized fashion. I can not stress it enough that Criminals don't follow the Rules.
Whether or not I believe in any of the people coming out to talk about the Anomolies is neither here nor there and is NOT as important as their Right to think and say what they know about. The ANTI Information League of Devils( I will not mention the Organization for they seem to survive off the blood of innocent posters , chiding the weak into shutting up, Intimidating the timid that do not know it is an Organized Movement. It goes beyond JUST Forums and Message Boards. I see the infiltration from Newspapers, in Radio Talk Shows. Seems everyone has free license to say anyone is a kook , and that is only when they do not want to draw attention to easily checkable records. If you call someone a Kook , chances are the passerby will look no further.- Cutting the Mic AND editing interviews also seems to have been quite successful in suppressing the Truth. We need the Iron Curtain lifted off the 9 - 11 Truth Movement.
You wouldn't think that a Woman with credentials like Judy Wood would be called something short of a Dental Technician would you?
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/me/mefaculty/pdfs/Wood1.pdf
So you wouldn't expect to see a post like this one:
Judy Wood is a materials science researcher. Her focus is dentistry compounds.
She doesn't have any expertise in office towers.
She needs to shut up until she gets more experience with office towers.
Her stupid little graphics make light of the collapse in which thousands of people died.
I call that last line the MONEY SHOT
and there are plenty of these but they are mostly from a gang of individuals either paid to proclaim her stupidity or a great pubic relations campaign full of red, white and blue ...the colors at least, I don't think people that anonymously attack like this are very brave. After all, no one can check out who THEY are can we.
Another thing that seems to set off these people that talk with their keyboards is the Star Wars Program of Ronald Reagan. Certainly these anonymous people know about the project and should know that experiements have to be done in order to figure out if the Initiative can be done. How do the anti Information People think this will unfold with out some experiementation? What do they thing the Powers at be would experiement on" After looking at the information that DARPA does allow to the public , I can understand why distracters find the people talking about it in relationship to 9/11 2001 to be a "problem" so they call all people that are aware of what is being worked on in the government sector "KOOKS"
Morgan Reynolds
On the Texas A & M University website
http://econweb.tamu.edu/profInfo.asp?id=23
Professor Emeritus
Labor Economics
(Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, 1971)
Former faculty of TEXAS A & M
and his address listed with them
Reynolds, Morgan; 26 Alta Way, Hot Springs Village, AR 71909, 501-922-3928
So far none of the Anti Information Movement have listed their addresses and/or Phone number so we can check out their credentials. One of their main complaint is that “NO ONE COMES FORWARD “ Well, Here is one from the Government. So why is it that that is not sufficient? WHY? Because their intention is not let anyone here beyond the rantings of these Anti Information People that say everyone is fake and everyone talking about the fallacies of this administration should be locked away. Something doesn't sit well with that scenario to me.
He Says :I was immediately struck by two things. First, the government believes it has to maintain public confidence in the economy in order to build and sustain prosperity. This not only reflects a degree of economic ignorance but also means that all news must be spun as good news, even when it is not. It reflects the desire to encourage docility, which makes the population easier to subjugate.
Second, as Ronald Reagan said, politics is just like show business, and truly, I was struck by the glitz of the whole enterprise at that level. I remember getting into the secretary's black sedan my first numbers day to tape an interview at the Fox News Channel with Neil Cavuto, and thinking just how much like Hollywood D.C. really is. The difference was that we were told not to call these cars limos but "sedans."
http://www.mises.org/story/1216
Well, He sounds like a down to earth guy very odd in Politics. Don't you think he learned about things that the people that insult him don't know? Could that be possible? Let's see what the Anti Information League say about Morgan Reynolds besides he is a Nut or in their articulate manner :A toofer.Moron Morgan Reynolds
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/moron-morgan-reynolds.html
With the admission of some of the CIA actions known as Family Jewels I don't think Morgan Reynolds is paranoid at all but informed. And I think he has more on the ball that these guys on Blogs with the campaign to destroy people's reputation for sharing what they know and what they believe is a possibility.
Reynolds: When I was interviewing, I was very clear about who I am and what I believe. I thought, "Wow, if the Bush administration is willing to appoint me, maybe we can do something." But my position did not require Congressional approval. Nor did they advertise me in the way you would an assistant secretary. Economists just don't have that kind of visibility. I was never attacked by the press, but, on the other hand, the administration didn't let me out that much. I only made two public speeches while I was there. Another cost of these jobs is that you cannot write for the public. I missed that.
Ok he says that men in these positions in government can not tell the Public things. I am glad he is no longer in Public office so he can give us HIS wisdom.
Another Blogger seems to take more exception to where Morgan Reynolds is Welcomed to state his concerns
n mid-2005 a former Bush administration official, Morgan Reynolds, gained notoriety by publishing an essay that sandwiched grandiose ridicule of the accounts of the crashes of the four jetliners between imprecise summaries of evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, and 7. Titled Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?, the article was widely promoted, for the most part, without any comment on its embedded no-jetliners message. Reynolds did not respond to the substance of the 911Research critique of his article: A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds' Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? , and went on to promote his flawed analysis of the plane crashes on venues like Coast to Coast and the Boulder Weekly. His Boulder Weekly interview is the subject of Boulder Weekly Trots Out Morgan Reynolds' Trojan Horse.
Even if Reynolds has only the best of intentions, his inclusion of easily debunked arguments against the jetliner crashes in his well-publicized article questioning the official account of the World Trade Center disaster makes it function as a Trojan Horse.
There are reasons why he chooses specific venues. The Main Stream Media rejects him and there should be no reason to block this type of discussion.
We can not come to actual answers with out all the information being presented.
|
911 investigations 