|
Eli Stone: Now that the country is focused on vaccines and autism |
|
|
Written by David Kirby, author, Evidence of Harm
|
|
Thursday, 31 January 2008 |
|
I am not
surprised by all the attention currently being lavished upon the new
ABC Series “Eli Stone.” The producers obviously wanted to kick off with
a controversial topic ripped from the headlines, and the vaccine-autism
debate surely fits the bill.
But now that we know that this is a
comedy-drama-fantasy, more “Ally McBeal” than “Law and Order,” maybe
everyone should take a deep breath and watch the show for its
entertainment value.
But now that the country is paying
attention to this rancorous and very real debate over vaccines and
autism, I believe it is clearly time to fund a large study of
vaccinated and unvaccinated children - to see if there is any
difference in the health outcomes of either group.
There are
millions of unvaccinated children in this country. If rates of autism
among the unvaccinated is the same as vaccinated children, then clearly
vaccines are not linked to the disorder. Why won’t the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention support this study, funding for which
has been proposed by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) in a bill described at
this link: http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=1383&Itemid=61
It makes one wonder why they would not want to vindicate vaccines and thimerosal once and for all.
|