Florida
Power & Light bought a ribbon of Everglades marl prairie 40 years
ago, envisioning it as an isolated place to some day run power lines.
Some day has come. FPL has filed for state permits to run three high-voltage power lines along the 7.4-mile strip.
But
the surrounding land has long since been absorbed by an expansion of
Everglades National Park, a federally protected wilderness where towers
topping 140 feet and lines buzzing with 500 kilovolts are officially
frowned upon.
Under orders from Congress, park
managers are now evaluating a compromise: a land swap with FPL that
would push the power corridor, now three miles west of Krome Avenue in
the footprint of a critical park restoration project, to the park's
eastern boundary.
For
FPL, securing a western corridor for power lines is crucial, not only
to handle projected population growth in Miami-Dade but also to move
additional juice from the utility's planned expansion of its Turkey
Point nuclear power plant. The company, already battling concerns from
residents and politicians from Cutler Bay to Coconut Grove over a
second proposed 230-kilovolt route up a long swath of U.S. 1, supports
the swap.
''For FPL, it provides the necessary land, albeit
smaller and closer to developed areas, in which to expand its
electrical facilities to meet its obligation to provide reliable
electric service to its customers in South Florida,'' said FPL
spokesman Mayco Villafaña in an e-mail.
For the park, the
existing corridor would complicate and potentially hinder a critical
part of the massive Everglades restoration effort -- bridging Tamiami
Trail to flow more water down the Northeast Shark River Slough, the
park's historic and long parched headwaters.
''As long as those
lands are there, there is a problem in terms of moving water to the
south,'' said Dan Kimball, superintendent of Everglades National Park.
The
land, only as wide as a football field, amounts to just 320 acres in
the 1.5 million-acre park. But FPL would have to fill in wetlands to
build bases to anchor the towers and an access road for maintainence.
Towers and power lines stretching more than seven miles wouldn't
exactly add to the vista, either.
CONCERNS ABOUT SWAP
Some environmentalists argue the massive transmissions lines don't belong in or along the border of a national park.
Sara
Fain, Everglades program manager for the National Parks Conservation
Association, said cutting a deal with the utility would set a bad
precedent for handling disputes over private holdings in national parks.
''There isn't one solution, swap the land or not,'' she said. ``There is another solution. Buy the land.''
One
potential alternative the park is considering is to acquire the land,
by buying or condemning it, said Brien Culhane, the park's chief of
planning and environmental compliance for the National Park Service.
But
either option could be expensive and require time-consuming legal
wrangling. FPL had discussed a land purchase for more than a decade,
Kimball said. ``We couldn't agree on the terms of acquisition.''
FPL,
which contends it must add power lines to improve the electrical grid
and get power to growing areas, is seeking four new routes in
Miami-Dade between 2012 and 2016. It has already filed permit requests
for both Glades routes with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection.
Villafaña said the trade would benefit the park and
utility, adding 60 acres to the park and removing a restoration
concern. In exchange for its 320-acre strip, FPL would take over a
230-acre strip with a 90-foot easement along L31-North canal, making
for easier worker access.
If the park accepts the swap, it would
clear the way for easy state approval for FPL. A decision, Culhane
said, is expected by January. If it rejects it, the utility could be
facing another difficult fight to run lines closer to suburbia in
western Dade -- perhaps along Krome Avenue.
CONGRESS' STAND
The
land swap was added to a massive spending bill Congress approved in
March and was supported by both Florida senators, Democrat Bill Nelson
and Republican Mel Martinez.
But the clause, which passed through
no committee reviews, explicitly left the final call to Secretary of
the Interior Ken Salazar, who oversees federal land.
It also
conflicts with the congressional language supporting the park's 1989
expansion, which explicitly called power lines an incompatible use.
This time, said the park's Culhane, ``Congress authorized but did not mandate that we do an exchange. It's not a directive.''
Link