Wife's Case Raises Disclosure Issue
A conservative legal foundation this week urged the House ethics panel to investigate Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) as new details emerged about his wife's involvement in a Detroit bribery scheme.
Though Monica Conyers, a Detroit City Council member, pleaded guilty
last month and admitted taking several thousand dollars in the scheme,
charges filed Wednesday against one of her former top aides allege that
the councilwoman took at least $65,000 from people seeking contracts
from the council or a pension board on which she sat in 2006 and 2007.
Federal prosecutors in Michigan accuse Conyers and the aide of using
their positions in government to engage in a "persistent and continuing
pattern of extortion and bribery." Prosecutors said last month that
they had "no suggestion" the congressman was aware of his wife's
activities.
Monica Conyers pleaded guilty to a single count of criminal
conspiracy and faces up to five years in prison. Former aide Samuel L.
Riddle Jr., who was released yesterday on an unsecured bond after an
initial court appearance, disputes the allegations.
The FBI investigation is providing ammunition to opponents of John
Conyers, who has been married to the former Monica Ann Esters for
nearly 20 years and who has served in Congress since 1965. The couple
lead mostly separate lives, according to friends in Detroit and
Washington.
The Landmark Legal Foundation, which has offices in Leesburg, this
week urged members of the House ethics panel to investigate whether
Conyers violated rules by failing to report on his financial disclosure
forms payments his wife accepted improperly.
The foundation also raised questions about a 2007 letter in which
the congressman urged the Environmental Protection Agency to expedite
the permitting process for a waste well project that would have
benefited a businessman who had contributed to his wife. The letter
originated in Monica Conyers's office.
A spokesman for Rep. Conyers has said the congressman supported the
project because it would have helped his constituents, including
retired firefighters and police officers.
Through a spokesman, Conyers declined to comment yesterday on the
Landmark letter. Conyers has previously declined to say whether he
would amend his financial disclosure forms.
link
|